Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
December 1, 2008
Free E-mail Newsletters:
RSS Feed | More Feeds | RSS Help

Home > 2008 > May (Web-only)Christianity Today, May (Web-only), 2008  |   |  
Denominations Join Episcopalian Diocese in Fight Over Church Property
Judge says Methodists, Worldwide Church of God, and others can participate in oral arguments.



ADVERTISEMENT

Sixteen Protestant denominations and regional districts have joined a friend-of-the-court brief supporting the Episcopal Diocese of Virginia in contesting a Reconstruction-era state law that governs church splits.

The post-Civil War splintering of Methodist and Presbyterian churches in 1867 prompted the Virginia law, which allows congregations to keep their property when seceding from a church or "religious society" that's dividing.

However, the United Methodist Church and the Presbyterian Church (USA), two of the largest U.S. mainline Protestant denominations, side with the Episcopal diocese in saying that the law is unconstitutional.

On Friday, May 16, a judge in Fairfax County, Va., ruled that the UMC, the African Methodist Episcopal Church, the African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church and the Worldwide Church of God may participate in oral arguments May 28 to assess the law's constitutionality.

The amicus curiae brief is a sign of how closely Protestants are following the multimillion-dollar battle between the Episcopal Church and 11 conservative congregations that left to join the Convocation of Anglicans in North America, which is sponsored by the Anglican Church of Nigeria.

The Protestants' amicus brief says the law draws "civil courts into a theological thicket" and favors congregational-based denominations over hierarchical churches.

The Episcopal Church, the UMC, the PC(USA) and other denominations argue that local congregations hold property—from the stained glass to bank accounts—in trust for the denomination. Their hierarchical structures, they say in the amicus brief, are religiously based, and civil courts have no business resolving "fundamentally religious questions."

The General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists, and Virginia-area districts of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America and the Church of the Brethren have also joined the amicus brief.

Virginia Attorney General Bob McDonnell and lawyers for the Congregation of Anglicans in North America, the umbrella group of breakaway churches, will defend the law at oral arguments.

Jim Oakes, co-chair of the Anglican District of Virginia, which is part of CANA, said Protestants' concerns are not relevant to the lawsuit.

"It's almost like they're hyperventilating, saying, `This will destroy hierarchical churches,'" he said. "It will do nothing of the sort."

The property dispute is expected to take years to settle; Oakes said CANA has already paid $2 million in legal fees.



Related Elsewhere:

The Diocese of Virginia site has press releases about the judge's decision and the amicus briefs. It also has a PDF of the amicus brief.

See Christianity Today's earlier coverage of the Virginia lawsuit, "Big Win for Va.'s Breakaway Anglican Parishes in Property Fight."





E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 10 comments.See all comments
Ian Scott   Posted: May 20, 2008 1:56 PM
The difficulty with the position of these denominations is that these buildings have been, in almost all cases, built and paid-for by the people of the local parish. Whatever the legal status of the property, is it just (i.e., righteous) for leaders to tell "Bob" and "Judy" that the church they paid for has to be given up? This is a particularly pressing problem since the people who built the churches would in most cases be siding with CANA on these issues, not the Episcopal hierarchy. True, none of this overrides episcopal leadership in church law. But should we, as Christians, not set aside such legal niceties when we see that they are leading to injustice?

Gregory Peterson   Posted: May 20, 2008 1:55 PM
"They" say that history repeats itself. First as tragedy, then as farce. Considering that churches were splintering before my grandfather was born in 1862 over issues of equality, it's really pathetic that they're still splintering over issues of equality in his great great grandchildren's day. At least this time, conservative evangelicals have kept their civil wars against their neighbors in churches and courts. Of course, anything that the courts might say that they don't like will be dismissed as some sort of satanic conspiracy against them by liberal "activist" judges...just as they did in 1954....hell bent on calling down God's judgment for not doing as they say. Their, as a collective, naked greed and contempt for justice and equality under the law and under God is almost as great as their traditional contempt for their neighbor...the one they so wish to exploit forever.

James Reid Ross   Posted: May 23, 2008 3:28 AM
The Episcopal church is bordering on being apostate they shouild repent and quit ordaining homosexuals, fornicators, adulterers and other unrepentant sinners.

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search





















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Church Secretary Today
Ignite Your Faith
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Today's Christian Woman
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com