Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
December 1, 2008
Free E-mail Newsletters:
RSS Feed | More Feeds | RSS Help

Home > 2008 > MayChristianity Today, May, 2008  |   |  
CHRISTIAN VISION PROJECT
The Poverty of Love
The desert fathers and mothers would know instantly why our gospel is too small.



ADVERTISEMENT

The last few decades, more and more evangelicals have been mining the treasures of Eastern Orthodoxy. One reason for their openness is the work of people like Bradley Nassif, professor of biblical and theological studies at North Park University in Chicago. For years he has been, as one editor put it, "a courageous and enthusiastic pioneer of Orthodox-evangelical dialogue around the world." While Nassif was exposed to evangelical faith in his youth, which he says gave his faith vitality, he has remained a faithful member of the Orthodox Church. But while championing the Orthodox cause, he's never been blind to its spiritual needs. As he put it in one article, "The most urgent need in the Orthodox world today is an aggressive 'internal mission' of (re)converting our people to Jesus Christ." In this Christian Vision Project article, Nassif suggests how one element of the Orthodox heritage might help reconvert all of us to the person and mission of Jesus Christ.

"Is our gospel too small?" Shouldn't the answer be obvious? As an Eastern Orthodox theologian, my first impulse was to point out that a small gospel has never been our problem. The name of the great 7th-century saint Maximus the Confessor symbolizes the maximal gospel proclaimed by him and all the Orthodox—one with cosmic implications that embraces the whole of creation. Proclaiming that kind of gospel has always been the Orthodox way. But then I came down to earth. Though Orthodoxy has a grand vision in principle, it often doesn't make a lot of difference in practice. I believe our theological compass is pointed in the right direction, but when it comes to following through on our not-so-small gospel, we are no better than anyone else.

So what's lacking in all our churches, regardless of tradition, that makes this question so necessary? My thoughts turn to the early 300s, to the deserts of Egypt, Palestine, and Syria, along the banks of the River Nile, in remote caves, abandoned forts and tombs, on mountaintops and pillars. There, men and women took up their crosses to fashion the old creation into the new—to seek the redemption and renewal of our fallen human nature by the power of the risen Lord. These desert dwellers provide us with the wisdom we seek.

The desert fathers and mothers heard Christ's call to deny themselves, take up the cross daily, and follow him (Luke 9:23) in a time similar to our own. Under Emperor Constantine, large numbers joined the church for the social privileges it bestowed. Many sought status and prosperity more than the cross. This influx of nominal Christians made the church a spiritually sick institution, and a radical illness called for a radical remedy. Ordinary men and women, most of them illiterate, heard the death-call of the gospel and responded by fleeing to the desert to live out their calling—either alone or in community. Peasants, shepherds, camel traders, former slaves, and prostitutes were the first to go.

The desert was not a place of escape as much as a place of countercultural engagement. The desert was the front line of spiritual warfare—as in the Bible, a place of testing and death. It was where the heart was purified, the passions conquered, sin destroyed, and humanity renewed.

Like the prophets of old, the desert dwellers reminded the church that the kingdom of God is not of this world. They insisted that if we confuse the gospel's values with our culture's values, it will have lethal results. They exposed the underside of a form of religion that fuels our hunger for self-centered living. Still today, their lives stand against the easy assurance of a too-inculturated gospel. They offer an alternative spiritual order, one based on Trinitarian divine love and human freedom. They offer an alternative portrait of what being human really means. And perhaps most radically, they call us to engage our external challenges by first conquering our own inner passions through the lordship of Christ.





E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 32 comments.See all comments
Ian Robinson   Posted: May 01, 2008 5:01 AM
I have many times been to the vast deserts of Central Australia, and experienced a lot of what the Desert Fathers (and Mothers) saw there in the majesty of God, the power of silence to communicate God's presence, human littleness below the cosmos of stars, and the father's palpable welcome to the little ones. This article captures that original genius in its focus upon depth of love, upon the work and wonder of emptiness so that Christ's love can be all in all. It threatens my city self because it is the opposite to 'achievement', a self-justifying stance, hence even athletic asceticism is opposite to the gospel-intent of the Desert Fathers. But the 'effort' of dispossession is the same as what Jesus said to every one who enquired of him how they could become his follower - sell, leave, repay, and so on. We miss the point if we react as though it is only about monastic-style ascetic disciplines.

David L   Posted: May 01, 2008 5:18 PM
I recently was received into Orthodoxy. I spent almost a decade amongst Protestant traditions, eg. Confessional Lutheran, Word Faith, Fundamentalist Baptist, Orthodox Presbyterians, the Reformed, the Non-denominational denomiantion, Calvary Chapel, UMC. Free Methodist, and so on. I think what RJR misses is what these people did by the grace of God, they gave up the world. What you are missing is the fullness of the faith, you are viewing the faith of the Orthodox and those men and women of blessed memory through the prism of your own hang-ups and experience. We do not all have the same vocation.

Pray for Nassif   Posted: May 01, 2008 8:27 PM
Hey Monachos, Nassif was quoted as a so-called "expert" in a local Arizona phony-baloney expose on a local Greek Orthodox Monastery. Here are Nassif's charitable words: "I would encourage the bishop to be the bishop, stand up for the gospel, at all costs, and, If necessary, if they refuse to follow the gospel, they should do their duty and excommunicate them." Fr. Anthony (a real monk) said this in response to Nassif: ": I feel sorry for those people, really. You know, we never stop praying for those people who have those evil thoughts in their minds." What this shows is that Nassif is only interested in paper Saints (paper Desert Fathers) that he can control or spin into something that MIGHT be palatable to the Evangelicals who are his real bread and butter. Dealing with Real Monks, real living Desert Fathers is something beyond his strength, intellect or desire. Orthodox Christians should join in prayer for poor Nassif.

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search





















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Church Secretary Today
Ignite Your Faith
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Today's Christian Woman
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com