Related articles and links |  1 of 3

The Protestant reformers named three "marks by which the true church is known": the preaching of the pure doctrine of the gospel, the pure administration of the sacraments, and the exercise of church discipline to correct faults. Today, church discipline is feared as the mark of a false church, bringing to mind images of witch trials, scarlet letters, public humiliations, and damning excommunications. Does discipline itself need correction and redemption in order to be readmitted into the body of Christ? We have asked several experts from different (and sometimes contrasting) professional and theological backgrounds to explain how church discipline fell into disrepair and how it can be revived, so that the true church can fully embody the pure doctrine of the gospel once again.

Day One | Day Two | Day Three | Day Four | Day Five | Day Six

Wolves love to prey on sheep. First Church learned this lesson the hard way. A respected member persuaded other members to invest thousands of dollars in a business venture. When the venture stalled and he refused to return their money, they complained to the pastor. The businessman rebuffed the pastor's inquiries, so the elders mentioned the possibility of church discipline. A threatening call from an attorney successfully intimidated them, however, so they simply asked the businessman to find a new church.

The wolf found a new flock to prey on, but he also continued to bilk other members of First Church out of thousands of additional dollars. When those investors later discovered that their leaders had known of the businessman's schemes and did nothing to warn them, they threatened to sue the church! The shepherds were discredited, the flock was ravaged, and the wolf continued to prowl.

Contrast this debacle with the outcome of a virtually identical situation involving another businessman at Second Church. (Both stories are true but disguised.) When the elders confronted him about misleading investors, he also wanted to duck the issue. But since the church had previously obtained "informed consent" from him and all its members to practice redemptive biblical discipline, the businessman did not even call an attorney. Nor did he cut and run to another church, because he knew that his membership covenant gave his pastor permission to contact any church he fled to and ask its leaders to address his behavior.

Unable to flee from discipline, he resentfully submitted to it. Eventually he softened under the loving admonishment of his elders, realizing that they were trying to free him from the grip of greed and deceitfulness. Three weeks later, he had returned all of the money to the investors. Since his conduct and the resulting gossip had affected many people, the businessman offered to make a public confession in a Sunday morning service. When he finished, one of the investors came forward and gave a heartfelt confession of her own sins of bitterness and gossip. The gospel wasn't just preached that Sunday; it was lived out before the entire congregation and several amazed visitors.

Church discipline can have major legal repercussions. The disciplined member may file suit against the church for defamation, invasion of privacy, and infliction of emotional distress.

That's why you should obtain "informed consent" from your congregation for your disciplinary practices. (This article is not intended to provide legal advice. Consult independent counsel familiar with biblical church discipline.) This requires that all members be fully informed of your disciplinary policies and agree to submit to those policies. This involves several key steps:

next page... |  1 of 3

August 2005, Vol. 49, No. 8